Related%20passage for Yoma 97:19

לא דילמא שאם רצה לעשות מדה עושה אי נמי שלא יחסר ושלא יותיר

and, furthermore, was it not R'Hanina who said: If he took the hands full of the incense before the slaying of the of the bullock, he has done nothing?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The ministration is invalid and must be repeated in proper form and order, infra 60b. As the taking of the hands full must not be performed before, but after the slaying of the bullock, the first high priest must have slain his bullock and the one who takes his place must slay another bullock, it is evident that he cannot use the handfuls taken by the first high priest, which took place before the slaying of the second bullock. Hence it seems impossible that R. Hanina could have asked the question attributed to him here.');">²⁴</span> - This is what he [R'Hanina] said: Since he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since R. Joshua asked the question, he must hold that the second priest need not bring another bullock, for if that were his view, the taking of the handful of the incense before the slaying of the bullock would have been invalidated. Hence the apposite remark that others of an earlier generation who, in opposition to him hold that 'with a bullock' includes even 'with the blood of his bullock' have already asked the question.');">²⁵</span>

Explore related%20passage for Yoma 97:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.